Grain growers and advisers are being encouraged to revisit their red-legged earth mite management strategies following the detection of insecticide resistance in populations of the pest in Victoria for the first time.
And with recent rains and cooler autumn temperatures expected to promote egg hatching of the mite, experts are advising close adherence to best-practice management strategies.
Entomologist Paul Umina, of scientific research organisation cesar, said the recent detection of resistance in Victoria was the furthest eastern point in Australia that insecticide resistance had been recorded in this pest.
“While the level of resistance detected in Victoria is considered ‘low-level’, we can’t stress enough the importance of having a resistance management strategy at the forefront of RLEM control in south-eastern Australia,” Dr Umina said.
While RLEM has had high levels of resistance to insecticides for more than a decade in Western Australia, cases of insecticide resistance are now being detected beyond that state.
Since 2016, resistance to both synthetic pyrethroids, including bifenthrin and alpha-cypermethrin, and organophosphates including omethoate and chlorpyrifos, has been detected in RLEM populations in numerous locations within South Australia.
RLEM has a wide appetite, feeding on a range of plants including (but not limited to) canola, clover, faba beans and lupins.
“If higher levels of insecticide resistance were to evolve to multiple chemistries and across larger areas, RLEM would be far more difficult to control on vulnerable establishing crops than what it is today in south-eastern Australia,” Dr Umina said.
Through a GRDC investment which supports scientific surveys and testing of suspect RLEM populations, cesar research scientist Aston Arthur collected RLEM populations in Victoria’s north in 2019, after an agronomist reported a spray failure with omethoate in 2018. The mites were collected from three paddocks in close proximity.
Back in the laboratory, Dr Arthur tested two organophosphate insecticides, omethoate and malathion, against these RLEM.
To determine if the test populations were expressing resistance, Dr Arthur ran a bioassay to compare their LC50 (the lethal concentration required to kill 50 per cent of the population) values to that of a known insecticide-susceptible population of RLEM.
Dr Arthur found at most a seven-fold increase when mites were tested against omethoate, and a 70-fold increase with malathion.
The test populations also underwent molecular testing to screen for resistance to synthetic pyrethroids. No synthetic pyrethroid resistance was found in any of the test populations.
Dr Umina said the ubiquity of the RLEM across many broadacre crops and pastures meant it was frequently exposed to insecticides and faced a high selection pressure to evolve resistance.
With sowing of winter crops and pastures already under way or just beginning, growers and advisers can source recommended best practice information on RLEM and resistance management in broadacre crops and pastures via two resources.
The first resource is the GRDC’s Red-legged earth mite best management practice guide – southern, which can be found at: https://grdc.com.au/redlegged-earth-mite-best-management-practice-guide-southern/
The second resource is the Resistance management strategy for the red-legged earth mite in Australian grains and pastures, which can be found at https://grdc.com.au/FS-RLEM-Resistance-strategy
This strategy outlines various chemical control approaches based on scenarios where there is no resistance, resistance to synthetic pyrethroids only, resistance to organophosphates only, or resistance to both synthetic pyrethroids and organophosphates.
RLEM may be mistaken for other crop-feeding mites.
For help with mite identification, cesar’s PestBites episode on crop and pasture mite identification can be viewed at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y02DKvGfOkQ